Settlemire

Settlemire v. Superior Court

Good Law
105 Cal. App. 4th 666·129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 560·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 88·2003 Daily Journal DAR 866·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 718
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 2003B158416California3,039 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The trial court assigns an order to show cause hearing involving a domestic restraining order and several other related issues to a commissioner for hearing. The attorney representing one of the parties will not stipulate to the commissioner and moves the court to vacate the assignment. The trial court denies the motion and assigns the case to the same commissioner “for a hearing, and findings on any matter of fact upon which information is required by the Court.”

This broad and imprecise order does not state the specific facts the commissioner is to decide. The order is like sending someone to the market to get food without a shopping list. We therefore grant a writ of mandate vacating the order.

Facts

Patricia Settlemire applied for a domestic violence restraining order against her husband, Randall Lane Settlemire (hereafter Settlemire), in the San Luis Obispo Superior Court. Commissioner Lane Stewart issued a temporary restraining order and set the matter for an order to show cause hearing to determine not just the restraining order, but temporary child custody, visitation, disposition of a community asset, the relinquishment of firearms, and the exclusion of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.