Bussard

Bussard v. Minimed, Inc.

Good Law
105 Cal. App. 4th 798·129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 675·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 94·2003 Daily Journal DAR 913·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 756
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 2003B158537California2,931 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rubin, J.

Appellant Barbara Bussard appeals from summary judgment for respondent Minimed, Inc. After review, we hold the “going-and-coming” exception to the doctrine of respondeat superior does not apply to an employee while she is driving home after becoming sick at work from exposure to pesticide fumes.

Procedural and Factual Background

On March 22, 2000, respondent Minimed hired a pest control company to spray pesticide overnight to eliminate fleas at respondent’s facility. Around 7:00 a.m. the next day, Minimed clerical employee Irma Hernandez arrived for work. She noticed a funny smell similar to “Raid.” By 10 o’clock, she felt ill, with a headache, nausea, and tightness in her chest. At noon, she told two supervisors she did not feel well enough to continue working and wanted to go home. One supervisor offered to send her to the company doctor, but Hernandez declined the offer, while another supervisor asked whether she felt well enough to drive home, and she said yes. (Eventually, nine workers went home early feeling ill and 22 employees sought medical care either that day or later for their exposure to the pesticide.)

Hernandez drove home shortly after noon. While in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.