Hayes

People v. Hayes

Good Law
105 Cal. App. 4th 1287·129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 885·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 144·2003 Daily Journal DAR 1309·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1065
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2003A099175California1,554 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rivera, J.

Defendant Rudolph Hayes challenges the order of the trial court extending his commitment under California’s mentally disordered offenders statutes (MDO law). We conclude that Hayes’s underlying offense is not a qualifying crime under the MDO law. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

I. Facts

On April 8, 1999, defendant Rudolph Hayes pled guilty to a violation of Penal Code section 452, subdivision (b). Section 452 provides in pertinent part: “A person is guilty of unlawfully causing a fire when he recklessly sets fire to or bums or causes to be burned, any structure, forest land, or property. [ID • • • [1] (b) Unlawfully causing a fire that causes an inhabited structure or inhabited property to bum is a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three or four years . . . .” The record indicates that a fire had begun in Hayes’s hotel room on June 9, 1996. One of the hotel managers, smelling smoke, entered the room and found a dresser on fire and Hayes sitting in a comer saying, “The devil came in my room.” The manager got water and put out the fire. After pleading guilty to recklessly setting the fire, Hayes was sentenced to three…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.