Catalina Car Wash, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations
Opinion
Opinion
Boland, J.
Summary
This case presents the question whether an employer was insured against workers’ compensation liability at the time of an inspection of its premises by the Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. We conclude coverage existed as a matter of law, even though evidence of insurance in the form of policy documents had not yet been issued by the insurer. As a consequence, the division’s penalty assessment of $21,000 against the employer for being uninsured on the date of the inspection must be withdrawn and the judgment against the employer reversed.
Factual and Procedural Background
The facts in this case are undisputed. On May 3, 2000, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (Division), represented by Deputy Labor Commissioner Diana Chen, conducted an inspection at Catalina Car Wash on Beverly Boulevard in Los Angeles. Chen asked to see proof Catalina had secured workers’ compensation insurance coverage, as required by statute. Catalina was unable to produce proof of coverage. Catalina’s supervisor contacted its insurance agent, who faxed a “certificate of insurance.” The certificate was not satisfactory, as it was marked…