Catalina Car Wash, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations

Good Law
105 Cal. App. 4th 162·129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 118·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 23·2003 Daily Journal DAR 277·68 Cal. Comp. Cases 19
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2003B155196California3,309 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boland, J.

Summary

This case presents the question whether an employer was insured against workers’ compensation liability at the time of an inspection of its premises by the Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. We conclude coverage existed as a matter of law, even though evidence of insurance in the form of policy documents had not yet been issued by the insurer. As a consequence, the division’s penalty assessment of $21,000 against the employer for being uninsured on the date of the inspection must be withdrawn and the judgment against the employer reversed.

Factual and Procedural Background

The facts in this case are undisputed. On May 3, 2000, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (Division), represented by Deputy Labor Commissioner Diana Chen, conducted an inspection at Catalina Car Wash on Beverly Boulevard in Los Angeles. Chen asked to see proof Catalina had secured workers’ compensation insurance coverage, as required by statute. Catalina was unable to produce proof of coverage. Catalina’s supervisor contacted its insurance agent, who faxed a “certificate of insurance.” The certificate was not satisfactory, as it was marked…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.