Bonta

CAL. ADVOCATES FOR NURSING HOME REFORM v. Bonta

Good Law
105 Cal. App. 4th 127·129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 228
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 2003A097107California13,432 words

Opinion

Opinion

Appellants allege that written and unwritten policies, procedures and guidelines of the Department of Health Services interpreting federal and state statutes relating to the Medicaid [1] program, which the department administers, constitute regulations within the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act (Gov.Code, § 11340 et seq.) (APA) and are therefore void because they were not promulgated in accordance with the APA. The trial court disagreed and granted summary judgment for the department. We agree with appellants that the department failed to dispositively demonstrate the absence of a triable issue of material fact or that appellants' claim lacks legal merit. Accordingly, we shall reverse the judgment.

This litigation was commenced by California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR), a California not-for-profit corporation which advocates on behalf of individuals eligible for benefits under the federal Medicaid program and their families, and Patricia McGinnis, the executive director of CANHR (collectively, appellants), against Diana M. Bonta, the Director of the Department of Health Services, as well as other department officials, all of whom are sued in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.