National Fair Housing Alliance v. A.G. Spanos Construction, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
Armstrong, J.
ORDER
Currently before the Court are:
Having read and considered the arguments presented by the parties in the papers submitted to the Court, the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without a hearing. For the reasons articulated below, the Court hereby DENIES the motions.
Background
A. The Parties
1. The Plaintiffs
The Plaintiffs are five fair housing organizations: (1) the National Fair Housing Alliance, “a national non-profit entity” with its principle place of business in Washington, D.C.; (2) Fair Housing of Marin, “a private non-profit community organization” located in San Rafael, California; (3) Fair Housing Napa Valley, “a non-profit community organization” located in Napa, California; (4) Metro Fair Housing Services, “a nonprofit community organization” located in Atlanta, Georgia; and (5) The Fair Housing Continuum, Inc., “a private, non-profit organization committed to equal housing opportunity and the elimination of discrimination in Florida.” See First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) at ¶¶ 15-19. Plaintiffs’ alleged missions include advocating for the rights of people with disabilities to accessible housing, promoting equal housing opportunities, and…