In Re Connetics Corp. Securities Litigation

Good Law
542 F. Supp. 2d 996·2008 WL 269467·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9634
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 2008C 07-02940 SICalifornia8,507 words

Opinion

Opinion

Illston, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

On October 19, 2007, the Court heard oral argument on motions to dismiss filed by nominal and individual defendants and a motion to strike filed by defendants Alexander Yaroshinsky and Victor Zak. Having considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss and GRANTS defendants’ motion to strike.

BACKGROUND

This is a securities class action against Connetics Corporation and certain of its officers under Sections 10(b), 20(a), 20A and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The case is brought on behalf all purchasers of the publicly-traded securities of Connetics between January 27, 2004, and July 9, 2006 (“the class period”).

Connetics is a pharmaceutical company specializing in prescription dermatological products. Plaintiffs allege that during the class period, Connetics was developing a new acne medication called Velac Gel (‘Ve-lac”) that would allow Connetics to participate in the lucrative market of prescription acne medications. In the period leading up to what defendants hoped would be the approval…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.