Ortega

People v. Ortega

Good Law
11 Cal. App. 4th 691·14 Cal. Rptr. 2d 246·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1415·92 Daily Journal DAR 16510·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9886
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 9, 1992B058501California2,017 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Here we hold that one who enters a home with the intent to commit extortion is guilty of burglary. This is the case even if the extortion will not be completed until sometime in the future at a location other than where the entry took place.

Facts

Defendant Gabriel Ortega, Jr., bought a car from Daniel ‘ Rodriguez. Rodriguez agreed to help Ortega fix the car if it needed minor repairs. A few weeks later, Ortega went to Rodriguez’s home and asked Rodriguez to fix the car. They spoke outside where Rodriguez was working on a truck. Rodriguez agreed to fix the car the next day. While Rodriguez was cleaning up, Ortega went to Rodriguez’s room to write a note reminding Rodriguez of their agreement.

Rodriguez entered the room to find Ortega searching through some drawers. Ortega explained he was looking for a pen, and questioned Rodriguez about the lock to his room and a radio. Ortega then wrote two notes to Rodriguez. One note was a reminder to fix the car. The other note read, “Danny, I’m going to take your radio if you do not come and fix my car by a certain date. I will use the proceeds of this radio, part of it to go to fix my car.” Both men then left the room. Soon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.