Hayes

Hayes v. Commission on State Mandates

Good Law
11 Cal. App. 4th 1564·15 Cal. Rptr. 2d 547·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1498·93 Daily Journal DAR 18·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 17
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 30, 1992C009519California13,230 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sparks, J.

This appeal involves a decade-long battle over claims for subvention by two county superintendents of schools for reimbursement for mandated special education programs. Section 6 of article XIII B of the California Constitution directs, with exceptions not relevant here, that “[w]henever the Legislature or any State agency mandates a new program or higher level of service on any local government, the State shall provide a subvention of funds to reimburse such local government for the costs of such program or increased level of service, . . .” The issue on appeal is whether the special education programs in question constituted new programs or higher levels of service mandated by the state entitling the school districts to reimbursement under section 6 of article XIII B of the California Constitution and related statutes for the cost of implementing them or whether these programs were instead mandated by the federal government for which no reimbursement is due.

The Santa Barbara County Superintendent of Schools and the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools each filed claims with the Board of Control for state reimbursement for alleged state-mandated costs incurred in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.