Talamantes

People v. Talamantes

Good Law
11 Cal. App. 4th 968·14 Cal. Rptr. 2d 311·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1440·92 Daily Journal DAR 16762·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10068
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 1992B062961California2,130 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

Driving under the influence of alcohol, appellant struck a car and killed its driver. A jury convicted him of second degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187. Unless otherwise noted, statutory references are to the Penal Code) and other related charges. On appeal he contends: (1) there is insufficient evidence of implied malice to sustain the murder conviction, (2) the trial court committed instructional error, and (3) he was prejudiced by wearing jail clothing during the trial. We find no error and affirm the judgment.

Procedural and Factual Background

Appellant was charged with second degree murder (§ 187, count I), gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated (§ 191.5, subd. (a); count II), driving under the influence of alcohol and causing great bodily injury (Veh. Code, § 23153, subd. (a); count III), and driving while having .08 percent blood alcohol and causing great bodily injury (Veh. Code, § 23153, subd. (b); count IV). Two prior driving-under-the-influence convictions were alleged (Veh. Code, § 13202.5; counts III and IV).

Appellant pleaded not guilty and denied the allegations. His motion to bifurcate trial of the allegations was granted, and he then admitted both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.