Barre

People v. Barre

Good Law
11 Cal. App. 4th 961·14 Cal. Rptr. 2d 307·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1448·92 Daily Journal DAR 16774·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10065
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 1992B057938California1,412 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

In a jury trial, when an alleged prior conviction has been denied and not bifurcated, may the trial judge take judicial notice of its records (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d)) as conclusive proof of that alleged prior conviction? Our answer is no. Accordingly, we in part reverse and in part affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

Because there is no insufficiency of evidence claim, the facts may be stated simply.

On October 1, 1990, in the afternoon, 25-year-old Ronald Edward Barre, Jr. (appellant) entered Mervyn’s department store in Redondo Beach carrying a May Co. bag. He went to the jeans counter, selected a pair of Levi’s and walked to a fitting room. After trying on the Levi’s he left the May Co. bag in the fitting room and returned the Levi’s to the counter.

A suspicious security guard who had followed appellant to the fitting room, entered appellant’s fitting room and looked inside the May Co. bag. Except for a fist-sized package, it was empty. The guard activated a video camera and waited for appellant’s return.

Appellant returned with two pairs of Levi’s. He tried on one pair and soon left the fitting room carrying one pair of Levi’s and a now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.