Bennett

Truck Ins. Exchange v. Bennett

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 142·53 Cal. App. 2d 75·53 Cal. App. 4th 75·61 Cal. Rptr. 2d 497·97 Daily Journal DAR 2196
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 1997B090428California5,556 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kitching, J.

Introduction

In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that a personal injury liability clause does not provide coverage for a cause of action for disparagement of title or slander of title brought against the insured. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we find that under the circumstances of this case, the insurers did not waive their right to assert lack of coverage and to withdraw from defending the insured, and they were not estopped from doing so. We affirm a grant of summary judgment in favor of insurers in their suit seeking a declaration that they had no duty to defend and indemnify the insured against claims made against him in an underlying action.

Procedural History

The relevant procedural events in this complex case are as follows: On March 24, 1986, Kenneth J. Roberts (Roberts) and Mandeville Broadcasting Company (Mandeville) filed a complaint (the Roberts action) against Peter C. Bennett (Bennett). The Roberts action alleged that Bennett had wrongfully claimed an ownership interest in radio station KROQ-FM as compensation for his services as Roberts’s attorney during the period in which Roberts acquired the Burbank Broadcasting Company…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.