Recorded Picture Co. [Prods.] Ltd. v. Nelson Entm't, Inc.

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 174·53 Cal. App. 2d 350·53 Cal. App. 4th 350·61 Cal. Rptr. 2d 742·97 Daily Journal DAR 3237
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 1997B097326California8,655 words

Opinion

Opinion

Masterson, J.

The producers of a motion picture entered into a written agreement with a distributor to exploit the picture domestically in the theatrical, television, and home video markets. The agreement contemplated that the distributor would enter into a separate contract with a subdistributor for home video release and obligated the distributor to require that the subdistributor pay 70 percent of the gross receipts directly to the producers.

The distributor entered into a subdistribution contract but did not require the subdistributor to pay anything directly to the producers. Moreover, despite the provision in the producer-distributor agreement requiring that the producers receive 70 percent of the gross receipts, the distributor agreed to a 50/50 split of the net receipts between itself and the subdistributor. The subdistributor approved this arrangement without actual knowledge of the terms of the producer-distributor agreement.

The producers filed this action against the distributor and the subdistributor, seeking to recover 70 percent of the gross receipts from the home video release of the picture. The producers and the subdistributor filed cross-motions for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.