MANDERSCHEID

People v. MANDERSCHEID

Good Law
121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 251·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4277·2002 Daily Journal DAR 6721·99 Cal. App. 4th 355·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5278
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 14, 2002B153757California3,432 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

Defendant, Steven Cree Manderscheid, appeals from his conviction, following his plea of nolo contendré, to a charge of maintenance of a place for unlawfully selling or using controlled substances. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11366.) Defendant argues the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5. We affirm.

We view the evidence in a light most favorable to the order denying the motion to suppress. (People v. Woods (1999) 21 Cal.4th 668, 673 [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 88 , 981 P.2d 1019 ]; People v. Superior Court (1974) 10 Cal.3d 645, 649 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 565 , 517 P.2d 829 ].) On September 8, 2000, Glendale Police Department Detective Todd Anderson received information from an informant. The informant had provided “reliable, accurate information in the past . . . .” The informant indicated a parolee named Bobby DiDonna was staying in defendant’s residence on Shady Grove in Tujunga. Mr. DiDonna was “considered armed.” Detective Anderson had previously served search warrants at defendant’s residence. Detective Anderson described what he did several days before his September 8, 2000, conversation with the informant: “I ran Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.