Thomas

People v. Thomas

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 4th 488·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1612·2005 Daily Journal DAR 12336·34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 858·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9059
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 14, 2005B169300California2,637 words

Opinion

Opinion

Epstein, J.

In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude that a purse snatch satisfies the force or fear element of robbery where the thief wrests the purse from the individual who has it on his or her person, using the amount of force necessary to get it away. In the nonpublished portion of the opinion we deal with the other issues raised by the defendant. We conclude that the trial court adequately instructed the jury that any violation of defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights incident to a search of her “bulk property” was harmless, and that there is no sentencing error under Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 [ 159 L.Ed.2d 403 , 124 S.Ct. 2531 ]. We shall affirm the judgment of the trial court.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

On a Saturday afternoon in June 2002, defendant Cora Lee Thomas and a companion engaged in a robbery crime spree in the Lancaster area of Los Angeles County. There were three separate episodes. In each, her companion (who was not tried with her and about whom little identifying information is supplied in this record) accosted a woman in the parking area of a supermarket or large shopping store or mall, and, using force, took or tried to take…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.