In Re Kenneth S.

People v. Kenneth S.

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 4th 54·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1565·2005 Daily Journal DAR 11981·34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 430·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8793
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2005B178488California4,110 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boren, J.

A petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 was initiated against respondent Kenneth S., a minor, alleging that he had committed second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) and misdemeanor battery (Pen. Code, § 242). The juvenile court sustained the petition as to both counts, the principal evidence against respondent being a confession he gave to police. Before the disposition hearing, respondent moved for a new trial on the ground that the then recent United States Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. Seibert (2004) 542 U.S. 600 [ 159 L.Ed.2d 643 , 124 S.Ct. 2601 ] (Seibert) established that he was in custody at the time he confessed, and, because he had not received the required Miranda warnings, his confession was inadmissible. The juvenile court granted the motion and dismissed the petition with prejudice when the People were unable to proceed. The People appeal from the order granting the new trial motion and dismissing the petition, contending that Miranda warnings were not required because respondent was not in custody at the time he confessed. Respondent contends that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

We reverse.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.