Underwood

Underwood v. Corsino

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 4th 132·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1580·2005 Daily Journal DAR 12036·34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 542·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8857
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 6, 2005B175020California1,498 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hastings, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Laurence and Ella Underwood appeal from a judgment entered in favor of their commercial tenant, defendant and respondent Kelly L. Corsino, and her subtenant, defendant and respondent Kim Conway (collectively respondents). The trial court ruled in favor of respondents in connection with appellants’ unlawful detainer action against respondents and also ordered abatement of rent in favor of respondents. We conclude the trial court exceeded its authority in ordering abatement of rent. Accordingly, we remand with directions to the trial court to modify the judgment.

FACTS

In October 2002, appellants entered into a lease with Corsino for use of commercial property as a production studio. Certain provisions of the lease allowed Corsino to do build-out improvements of the property, and appellants agreed to be responsible for installing a climate control unit, checking and repairing the roof, and repairing a hole in the back yard. The lease also required Corsino to utilize the property in accord with all municipal ordinances.

In March 2003, the property was used for videotaping of a “wrap party.” Certain municipal code violations were asserted in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.