IAMCO

Independent Ass'n of Mailbox Center Owners, Inc. v. Superior Court

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 4th 396·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1605·2005 Daily Journal DAR 12231·34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 659·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9006
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 2005D045354California7,933 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

Plaintiff franchise owners, both individuals and their professional association, Independent Association of Mailbox Center Owners, Inc. (IAMCO), et al. (collectively the franchisees or plaintiffs), brought a complaint raising numerous statutory and common law claims to challenge the conversion of their stores into a new format, “The UPS Store” system, created by defendant Mail Boxes Etc., USA, Inc., et al. (MBE). Following trial court rulings that their claims against MBE, their franchisor, must be arbitrated on an individual basis, and not on a classwide or group basis, the franchisees filed this writ petition challenging the denial of their consolidation motion and related rulings that declined to shift all arbitration costs to MBE and imposed a stay as to certain franchisees.

The subject franchise agreements and their arbitration and/or mediation clauses fall into three main groups: Those governed by the rules of the American Arbitration Association (AAA, covering 17 of the petitioners); those governed by the rules of JAMS (Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, covering 11 petitioners); and those governed by mediation clauses rather than any arbitration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.