People v. Palmer

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 4th 1141·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1696·2005 Daily Journal DAR 12931·35 Cal. Rptr. 3d 373·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9457
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 31, 2005B170281California6,561 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant Ralph Carl Palmer committed an armed robbery of a Stein Mart store. As Palmer was attempting to drive from the crime scene, La Verne Police Officer Michael Burks stopped Palmer in the store parking lot. As Burks was exiting his patrol vehicle, Palmer suddenly exited his car, swiveled around, and shot at Burks. Burks dove for cover behind his patrol vehicle’s door, breaking his ankle in the process. A jury convicted Palmer of second degree robbery, attempted murder, and assault on a peace officer with a semiautomatic firearm. It also found true allegations that Palmer personally and intentionally used and discharged a firearm during commission of the attempted murder and assault, proximately causing great bodily injury. (Pen. Code, § 12022.53, subd. (d).) As a result of the jury’s findings on the section 12022.53, subdivision (d) allegations, Palmer’s sentence was enhanced by a prison term of 25 years to life.

In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude that the section 12022.53, subdivision (d) enhancement for discharging a firearm, proximately causing injury, is satisfied even though the injury at issue is not a bullet…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.