Wiege

People v. Wiege

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 4th 1342·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1711·2005 Daily Journal DAR 13113·35 Cal. Rptr. 3d 482
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 4, 2005B178654California1,547 words

Opinion

Opinion

Klein, J.

Defendant and appellant, Donald Wiege, Jr., appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction, by jury trial, for receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496d, subd. (a)). Sentenced to state prison for two years, he now appeals, claiming there was trial error.

The judgment is affirmed.

BACKGROUND

Viewed in accordance with the usual rule of appellate review (People v. Ochoa (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1199, 1206 [ 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 23 , 864 P.2d 103 ], the evidence established the following.

1. Prosecution evidence.

On May 4, 2004, Ana Robles drove her 1995 Chevy Tahoe Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV) to her 6:00 a.m. shift at the Robinsons-May distribution center in the City of Industry. She parked in the company parking lot. Around 10:00 a.m., Robles was notified her SUV had been stolen. She checked, and found it was missing from the parking lot. She had not given anyone permission to use it. When she retrieved her vehicle that afternoon, she found the dashboard frame broken and her car’s stereo equipment ripped out and thrown into the back.

At about 9:35 a.m. that same morning, police officers went to East 25th Street in Los Angeles. At the rear of this residence, they…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.