Smith v. Ben Bennett, Inc.

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 4th 1507·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1748·2005 Daily Journal DAR 13262·35 Cal. Rptr. 3d 612·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9727
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 10, 2005E035349California6,417 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richli, J.

In this case, we must decide whether the statute tolling the limitations period for an action based on a health care provider’s “professional negligence” (Code Civ. Proc., § 364, subd. (d); see also id., subd. (a)) applies to a claim against a health care provider for the enhanced remedies available under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 15600 et seq.) (hereafter the Elder Abuse Act or the Act). We will hold that it does not. Accordingly, the trial court properly sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s elder abuse claims on the ground that they were time-barred.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On April 19, 2001, Sarabell Smith (Smith) filed this action against Ben Bennett, Inc., doing business as Community Care and Rehabilitation Center (CCRC), as well as other defendants not parties to this appeal. Smith alleges that on December 31, 1999, her husband, Marvin Smith, then aged 78, was admitted to CCRC, a skilled nursing facility. While there, he was abused, beaten, unlawfully restrained, and denied medical treatment. On January 16, 2000, he was admitted to a hospital, and on January 20, 2000, partly as a result of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.