Edd

First Aid Services of San Diego, Inc. v. California Employment Development Department

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 4th 1470·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1746·2005 Daily Journal DAR 13235·35 Cal. Rptr. 3d 663·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9710
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 19, 2005D046136California3,706 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nares, J.

Plaintiff First Aid Services of San Diego, Inc. (First Aid) appeals a judgment of dismissal entered in favor of defendants California Employment Development Department (EDD) and California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (Board) (together the State) after the court issued an order sustaining without leave to amend the State’s demurrer to First Aid’s amended petition for a writ of administrative mandamus (amended petition), which challenged the Board’s decision that Tiffany Whittaker was an employee of First Aid, rather than an independent contractor, and thus eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits. Referencing the California Constitution and citing Unemployment Insurance Code section 1851 and Modern Barber Col. v. Cal. Emp. Stab. Com. (1948) 31 Cal.2d 720 [ 192 P.2d 916 ] (Modern Barber Colleges), the court found that the writ of administrative mandamus proceeding was barred because the purpose of the writ sought in First Aid’s amended petition “would be to restrain the collection of a tax.”

First Aid contends that (1) the rule in Modern Barber Colleges does not apply because the relief that First Aid sought in its amended petition was not to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.