Daggs

People v. Daggs

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 4th 361·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1589·2005 Daily Journal DAR 12200·34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 649·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8936
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 12, 2005A107792California3,178 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stein, J.

James Daggs entered a plea of no contest to one count of robbery after the court denied his motion to suppress evidence. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on supervised probation for three years on condition that he serve eight months in county jail, and required him to pay restitution and fines. He filed a timely notice of appeal.

We shall find no error with respect to the court’s determination that defendant abandoned his cell phone at the scene of the robbery, and therefore no unlawful search occurred when the police removed the battery to view numbers identifying the phone.

Facts

On December 7, 2003, Felix Bria, a clerk at a Walgreen’s store, saw defendant go behind a counter and grab several cartons of cigarettes. Bria tried to stop defendant by grabbing his arm. Defendant spun around, sprayed Bria in the eye with pepper spray, and ran from the store. After the police arrived on the scene, they found a cell phone in the area near the cash register where Bria had confronted defendant. Bria had used that cash register 10 to 15 minutes before his confrontation with defendant and had not seen a cell phone in that area.

No one tried to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.