Dominguez

Dominguez v. Washington Mutual Bank

Good Law
168 Cal. App. 4th 714·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 2286·85 Cal. Rptr. 3d 705·104 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1586
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 2008B195853, B198155California5,082 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rubin, J.

Yoko Dominguez appeals from the separate summary judgments entered in favor of defendants Washington Mutual Bank and Javier Gutierrez in her action for job discrimination based upon her sexual orientation. Because triable issues of fact exist concerning whether she timely exhausted her administrative remedies and as to the existence of discrimination, we reverse the judgments. Because Dominguez may not maintain an action for job retaliation against Gutierrez, we remand with directions to enter an order granting him summary adjudication of that claim only. We affirm, however, as to Washington Mutual’s assertion that Dominguez cannot raise triable issues of fact on her punitive damages claim, and, on remand, direct the trial court to grant summary adjudication on that issue only.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Yoko Dominguez sued Washington Mutual Bank (WaMu) and WaMu employee Javier Gutierrez for violating the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA; Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.), alleging that she had been harassed by Gutierrez and eventually fired from her job at WaMu because she was a lesbian. (Gov. Code, § 12940.) Dominguez began working at WaMu in March 2002 as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.