Briggs

Briggs v. Resolution Remedies

Good Law
168 Cal. App. 4th 1395·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 2392·86 Cal. Rptr. 3d 396
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 2008A121594California2,224 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sepulveda, J.

Appellants Catherine Louise Briggs and Scott Briggs filed a petition for a writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) to direct a private arbitrator to lift a stay he had imposed in the arbitration of a dispute concerning an uninsured motorist policy issued by GEICO General Insurance Company (GEICO). The trial court denied the petition, finding that the arbitrator did not err in issuing a stay. We conclude that the trial court lacked the authority to review a discretionary, prehearing order of an arbitrator, and we affirm the judgment on that basis.

I.

Factual and Procedural Background

In August 2005, Ms. Briggs suffered injuries when an uninsured motorist rear-ended her while she was driving on work-related business in a company car provided to her by her employer. Although the accident took place while Ms. Briggs was acting in the scope of her employment, she declined to file a workers’ compensation claim. The parties were not able to agree on whether GEICO had a duty to pay Ms. Briggs before there was a determination of her entitlement to workers’. compensation benefits. On June 23, 2007, appellants demanded arbitration with GEICO. The dispute was submitted to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.