Rushing

People v. Rushing

Good Law
168 Cal. App. 4th 354·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 2170·85 Cal. Rptr. 3d 437
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 2008C054676California2,292 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

In an information filed in October 2005, defendant Kenneth Rushing was charged as follows:

Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant pled guilty to count I and admitted the five prior strikes and serving two prison terms.

In exchange for defendant’s plea, the prosecution agreed to dismiss count II, a felony, and an unrelated misdemeanor charge for driving under the influence.

In connection with the entry of his plea, defendant agreed in writing as follows: “I understand that the maximum term facing me as a result of this plea is 27 yrs to life.”

In addition, the oral colloquy between the court and defendant, when defendant entered his plea, includes the following:

Defendant was sentenced to 27 years to life in prison: 25 years to life for failing to register as a sex offender with five prior strike convictions, and a two-year enhancement for serving two prior prison terms. Without obtaining a certificate of probable cause, defendant appeals, contending:

In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude that defendant’s constitutional contentions are not cognizable on appeal without a certificate of probable cause. In the unpublished portion of the opinion, we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.