Microsoft Corp. v. Yokohama Telecom Corp.

Good Law
98 Daily Journal DAR 3755·993 F. Supp. 782·1998 WL 49079·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1422
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 1998SA CV 97-0775-GLT SFCalifornia1,174 words

Opinion

Opinion

Taylor, J.

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

The court holds the broad wording of California’s privileged publication statute, California Civil Code § 47(d), can accord an absolute privilege to a litigant’s paid newspaper announcement of a lawsuit’s allegations.

I. BACKGROUND

Microsoft Corporation sued defendants for copyright and trademark infringement. Defendant Yokohama counterclaimed, contending it was damaged by an allegedly defamatory paid announcement published by Microsoft in the Shih Chie Jin-pao or World Daily newspaper.

The announcement was directed at computer system builders and warned of Microsoft’s ongoing anti-piracy investigation and enforcement program. Among others, the announcement identified Yokohama as a company “alleged to have distributed counterfeit Microsoft products to undercover investigators.”

Microsoft has moved on privilege -grounds for summary adjudication of Yokohama’s defamation counterclaim.

II. DISCUSSION

California law defines several areas which are absolutely jprivileged from defamation actions. Here, Microsoft contends the publication absolute privilege in Cal. Civ.Code § 47(d) protects its paid announcement in the World Daily.

There is no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.