Young

Young v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

Good Law
168 Cal. App. 4th 1467·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 2400·86 Cal. Rptr. 3d 507
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 11, 2008B189263California3,914 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cooper, J.

SUMMARY

An employee who was terminated after closing down a 24-hour service station for several hours, in violation of company policy, sued her employer and her supervisor, alleging claims of harassment on the basis of mental disability, retaliation, and wrongful termination, among others. The employer and supervisor sought and obtained summary judgment, and the supervisor then sought attorney fees. The court found the claims against the supervisor were frivolous and brought in bad faith, but awarded nominal attorney fees of $1 because the supervisor’s fees were paid by the employer. The employee appealed from the grant of summary judgment, and the employer and supervisor cross-appealed from the award of attorney fees. We find no merit in either appeal and affirm the judgment, with a modification in the amount of costs.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Laura Young, a student at Antelope Valley College, worked as a sales associate at an ExxonMobil service station in Lancaster on a part-time basis from April 2004 until she was fired on September 16, 2004. The station was open 24 hours a day. On September 15, 2004, Young worked a shift, alone, from 9:00 p.m. until…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.