T&R Painting Construction Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 243·23 Cal. App. 4th 738·29 Cal. Rptr. 2d 199·94 Daily Journal DAR 3717·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2044
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 1994B076895California2,558 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boren, J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the surety on a construction bond is liable for attorney fees incurred by a bond beneficiary. The beneficiary’s contract with the surety’s principal calls for the payment of fees to the prevailing party in the event of any legal action.

Following the statutory mandate that a surety’s liability is commensurate with that of its principal (Civ. Code, § 2808), we conclude that the surety is liable for the attorney fees that its principal was ordered to pay to the beneficiary after a legal dispute was resolved in favor of the beneficiary.

Facts

A property owner, London Pacific Investors (LPI), hired a general contractor, Capitol Systems (Capitol), to construct a residential development called Sycamore Village. The contractor, Capitol, obtained performance and payment bonds from respondent St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul). In the payment bond, St. Paul agreed to pay claims made by subcontractors in the event that Capitol failed to pay the subcontractors for labor and materials supplied. The payment bond does not have an attorney fees clause.

Appellant T&R Painting Construction, Inc. (T&R) entered into a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.