City of Chula Vista v. County of San Diego

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 302·23 Cal. App. 4th 1713·29 Cal. Rptr. 2d 89·94 Daily Journal DAR 4644·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2457
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 9, 1994D018644California2,328 words

Opinion

Opinion

Work, J.

The City of Chula Vista (City) appeals a judgment dismissing its action after the court sustained demurrers by the County of San Diego (County) and Appropriate Technologies II, Inc. (Aptec) without leave to amend. The City had petitioned for writ and other relief after the County approved an agreement allowing Aptec to continue to operate its hazardous waste transfer and treatment facility for five years. The court found the City’s claims were barred by the statute of limitations in Public Resources Code section 21167, subdivision (d). Because we conclude the City’s action is barred by the 180-day limitations period in that statute and it is not reasonably possible its petition can be amended to state a cause of action, we affirm the judgment.

I

In 1980, the County decided to terminate its Otay landfill hazardous waste operations and granted Aptec a five-year lease to operate a hazardous waste facility on County property located within the City. The lease was extended through September 19, 1990, when Aptec exercised its option to renew. In 1981, the City approved a conditional use permit for the Aptec facility, finding it would have no significant environmental impact…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.