Zepeda

People v. Zepeda

Good Law
105 Cal. Rptr. 2d 187·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 215·2001 Daily Journal DAR 2879·87 Cal. App. 4th 1183
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2001H020849California12,120 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bamattre-Manoukian, J.

Defendant Jaime Ledesma Zepeda appeals after conviction, by jury trial, of first degree murder. (Pen. Code, § 187.) The jury found true an allegation that defendant used a firearm (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)(1)) and an allegation that he discharged a firearm and caused death (§ 12022.53, subd. (d)). The trial court sentenced him to a term of 25 years to life for the murder, with a consecutive term of 25 years to life for the firearm discharge allegation.

On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred by: (1) admitting statements obtained from a wiretap on the telephone in his jail cell; (2) admitting expert opinion testimony about his motive for the shooting; (3) instructing the jury to stop deliberating if it could not reach a unanimous verdict as to first degree murder (CALJIC No. 8.75); and (4) admitting evidence that defendant was involved in a prior gang-related shooting. Defendant also contends that the 25-year-to-life sentence imposed for the firearm discharge allegation constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. We will affirm the judgment.

Defendant has also filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, which we agreed to consider with this appeal. We have disposed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.