AJIDA TECHNOLOGIES v. Roos Instruments

Good Law
104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 686·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 146·2001 Daily Journal DAR 2213·87 Cal. App. 4th 534·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1758
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 1, 2001H020311California7,103 words

Opinion

Opinion

This is an appeal from a judgment confirming an arbitration award. The appeal rests on a claim that the arbitrators exceeded their authority. At issue are two provisions of the award, both drawn from the parties' terminated agreement and both governing future controversies. The challenged provisions compel further arbitration and permit an award of attorneys' fees in the event of future disputes over the arbitration award. We conclude that the arbitrators acted within the scope of their powers in including the arbitration and fee provisions in the award. We therefore affirm the judgment.

The parties to this proceeding are Ajida Technologies, Inc. ("respondent") and Roos Instruments, Inc. and Mark Roos (collectively, "appellant"). This dispute arose out of the parties' 1991 Joint Marketing and Development Agreement ("JMDA" or "the agreement").

The agreement contemplated that appellant and respondent would work together to develop and market a microwave measurement system for testing integrated circuits. Under the terms of the agreement, each party bore equal responsibility for the venture. By the same token, the parties were to share equally in any benefits from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.