Punsly

Punsly v. Ho

Caution
105 Cal. Rptr. 2d 139·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 206·2001 Daily Journal DAR 2761·87 Cal. App. 4th 1099
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 2001D036025California4,278 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

Manwah Ho, the mother of Kathryn Punsly, appeals an order granting visitation to Kathryn’s paternal grandparents, Marilyn and Bernard Punsly under Family Code section 3102. Manwah contends section 3102 is unconstitutional, as applied to her, in light of the recent United States Supreme Court case of Troxel v. Granville (2000) 530 U.S. 57 [ 120 S.Ct. 2054 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 ] (Troxel), a case concerning the constitutionality of a nonparental visitation statute, and TroxeV s appellate progeny. Manwah also contends the court’s ancillary orders attached to the visitation order, independently, violated her constitutional due process rights. We conclude section 3102, as applied in this case, unconstitutionally infringed on Manwah’ s fundamental rights. Accordingly, we reverse the order in its entirety.

Statement of Facts

Manwah married the Punslys’ son, Richard, and they had one child, Kathryn, born in 1990. In 1992, Manwah and Richard divorced and while they shared joint legal and physical custody of Kathryn, Manwah assumed primary physical custody. Richard was diagnosed with bone cancer after the divorce and died in 1996.

Following Richard’s death, the Punslys continued to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.