Save Sunset Strip Coalition v. City of West Hollywood

Good Law
105 Cal. Rptr. 2d 172·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 210·2001 Daily Journal DAR 2827·87 Cal. App. 4th 1172·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2236
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2001B143615California3,730 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs, Save the Sunset Strip Coalition, Gigi Verone and Geoffrey Smith, appeal from a judgment denying a writ of mandate. Plaintiffs challenged actions of the defendants, City of West Hollywood and its city council (collectively, the city), with respect to a development project. The developer, Sunset Millennium Associates, LLC (Sunset), is the real party in interest. In the published portion of this opinion, we discuss Vehicle Code section 21101, subdivisions (a) and (f), as they relate to the installation of a cul-de-sac on a street entirely within the city’s boundaries, which implements the circulation element of the city’s general plan. We affirm the judgment.

II. Background

The city adopted the “Sunset Specific Plan” to guide the development of that portion of Sunset Boulevard that lies within its borders. The area in question is commonly known as the Sunset Strip. The Sunset Specific Plan assumed, based on a market study and other factors, that certain types of development were likely. The Sunset Specific Plan capped development at a level lower than would have been allowed under the city’s general plan. In connection with the Sunset Specific…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.