Flanagan

Flanagan v. Flanagan

Good Law
77 Cal. App. 4th 122·91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 422
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2000B122810California5,871 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jerry K. Staub and Patricia Venegas, Glendale, for Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Allen, Matkins, Leek, Gamble & Mallory, Edwin W. Green, A. Kristine Floyd and Bruce W. Hepler, Irvine, for Cross-defendant and Respondent.

GRIGNON, Acting P.J.

Penal Code sections 632 and 637.2 authorize a civil action for treble damages or statutory penalties against an individual who electronically records a confidential communication. In this case, we are concerned with the nature of a confidential communication, the manner in which the statutory penalties are imposed, whether the statutory penalties violate due process and whether punitive damages may be awarded for violation of the statute. A jury found that 24 confidential communications had been electronically recorded and awarded a statutory penalty of $5,000 for each recording. The jury awarded a total of $120,000 in statutory penalties and $1.2 million in punitive damages. The trial court reduced the statutory penalties to $5,000 and struck the punitive damage award. We modify the judgment to increase the statutory penalties and otherwise affirm.

Honorine Flanagan is the stepmother of Michael Flanagan. [1] On July 1, 1996, Honorine…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.