Lochtefeld

People v. Lochtefeld

Caution
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 14·2000 Daily Journal DAR 417·77 Cal. App. 4th 533·91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 778·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 337
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 2000D031877California3,941 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

Penal Code section 245, subdivision (c) punishes “an assault with a deadly weapon or instrument, other than a firearm, or by any means likely to produce great bodily injury upon the person of a peace officer . . . .” (Italics added.) As has been often noted, a pellet gun is clearly an instrument other than a firearm. (See, e.g., In re Jose A. (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 697, 700-701 [ 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 44 ].) Courts have found pellet guns to be deadly or dangerous weapons in the context of other penal statutes. May a pellet gun also, as a matter of law, be a deadly weapon within the meaning of section 245? The question does not appear to have been answered. We hold that the pellet gun used here was, as a matter of law, a deadly weapon within the meaning of section 245.

Facts

Daniel Bernard Lochtefeld (Lochtefeld) was a resident of the Pine Hotel on Front Street in downtown San Diego. On September 23, 1997, a fellow resident, Carolyn Scott, saw Lochtefeld standing outside the hotel waving a big handgun in the air. Scott told the hotel manager, Vivian Caparell, that Lochtefeld was walking around with a gun in his hand.

Scott continued to watch Lochtefeld, and saw him at a bus stop…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.