Bollag

Peak-Las Positas Partners v. Bollag

Good Law
172 Cal. App. 4th 101
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 26, 2009B205091California4,730 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Parties agree to act reasonably in their contractual relationship. This case demonstrates that when a party acts unreasonably, it is reasonably certain that no one prospers.

Michael Bollag appeals a judgment extending the escrow on a land sale contract so that buyer Peak-Las Positas Partners (PLP) can obtain a lot line adjustment for a housing project. The trial court found that Bollag acted unreasonably in refusing to extend the escrow after PLP paid most of the purchase price and incurred about $5 million in costs for the lot line adjustment. PLP also received attorney’s fees and costs. We affirm.

Facts

PLP, a general partnership, owns and plans to develop a 10-acre parcel near Las Positas Road in Santa Barbara. Bollag owns the adjoining 86-acre parcel, which includes a ridgetop residence at 3666 Campanil Drive, Santa Barbara. The property is hilly terrain and slopes down to PLP’s property.

In 1999, PLP entered into a purchase and sale agreement and joint escrow instructions (purchase agreement) to buy 4.5 acres of Bollag’s property for $475,000. After escrow opened on July 23, 1999, PLP paid a $150,000 nonrefundable deposit. The purchase agreement provides that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.