Ramos

321 Henderson Receivables Origination LLC v. Ramos

Good Law
172 Cal. App. 4th 305·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 376·91 Cal. Rptr. 3d 222
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2009F056252California4,528 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ardaiz, J.

INTRODUCTION

In this appeal from an order denying petition for approval of transfer of structured settlement payment, appellant, 321 Henderson Receivables Origination LLC (hereinafter Henderson), contends that the superior court exceeded its authority in issuing the order. For the following reasons, we reverse.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. General Background

Henderson, an indirect subsidiary of J.G. Wentworth, LLC, is a factoring company. Factoring companies engage in the business of paying people who have received a structured settlement annuity because of a successful tort claim of a lump sum payment and, in exchange, the right to some or all of the structured settlement annuity payments is transferred to the factoring company. Henderson earns a profit, in part, by paying these persons a lump sum payment that is less than the discounted face value of the annuity payments. Partially in response to then pending federal legislation that would provide favorable tax treatment to structured settlement transfers that were court approved, California enacted a law, the Structured Settlement Transfer Act (hereinafter SSTA), that requires (1) disclosures to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.