INTERNATIONAL ASSN. OF FIRE FIGHTERS, LOCAL 188, AFL-CIO v. Public Employment Relations Bd.

Good Law
172 Cal. App. 4th 265·91 Cal. Rptr. 3d 551
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2009A114959California9,287 words

Opinion

Opinion

Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai, Charles D. Sakai, Randy Riddle, K. Scott Dickey and Meryln Goeschl for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

McGUINESS, P. J.—

Faced with a severe financial crisis, the City of Richmond (City) laid off 18 firefighters and consequently reduced the number of firefighters on each work shift. The firefighters' union, International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 188, AFL-CIO (Local 188), sought to meet and confer over the decision, but the City claimed the layoff decision was not subject to collective bargaining. Local 188 filed an unfair practices claim with the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB), which dismissed the charges relating to the layoff and shift staffing decision. This appeal arises out of Local 188's petition to compel PERB to issue a complaint against the City.

The threshold jurisdictional question on appeal is whether a court may consider a challenge to a PERB decision dismissing an unfair labor practices charge and refusing to issue a complaint under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov. Code, [1] § 3500 et seq.) (MMBA or Act). We conclude an aggrieved party may seek a writ of mandate on certain narrow grounds described in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.