Maldonado

People v. Maldonado

Good Law
172 Cal. App. 4th 89·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 358·90 Cal. Rptr. 3d 750
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 2009H031506California3,785 words

Opinion

Opinion

McADAMS, J.

INTRODUCTION

A jury convicted defendant of possessing methamphetamine for sale, a felony, and being under the influence of methamphetamine, a misdemeanor. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11378, 11550, subd. (a).) Defendant admitted that he had three prior convictions for being under the influence of, or using, a controlled substance. The court placed defendant on probation for three years.

On appeal, defendant contends (1) the trial court had no jurisdiction to try him because the district attorney failed to file an information; (2) defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to object to evidence that defendant was unemployed and on welfare, and eliciting further evidence of his financial straits; and (3) the prosecutor committed misconduct by arguing that defendant placed the jacket in which the methamphetamine was found into his jail property. We affirm.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On the evening of December 13, 2006, three San Jose police officers went to 642 North 11th Street in San Jose to execute an arrest warrant on Jolene Scoggins and conduct a parole search of the premises. Scoggins was not there but defendant and two other persons were in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.