McAvoy

McAvoy v. Hilbert

Good Law
172 Cal. App. 4th 707·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 419·91 Cal. Rptr. 3d 437·9 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3824
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 24, 2009D052802California2,241 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nares, J.

In this action arising out of the sale of a woodworking business owned by Randall K. McAvoy and Trudy K. Esther McAvoy (together, the McAvoys), together with the real property upon which the business operated, Dail W. Hilbert, the broker on the transaction, appeals from an order denying his petition to compel arbitration. The court denied the petition on the basis that (1) the arbitration clause in Hilbert’s open listing agreement with the McAvoys failed to meet the statutory disclosure requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 1298; and (2) there was a strong possibility of conflicting rulings with regard to the nonarbitral portions of the action, and therefore the court, acting in its discretion under section 1281.2, elected to not enforce the arbitration clause.

On appeal, Hilbert asserts the court erred in denying his petition to compel arbitration arguing (1) section 1298 does not apply to an open listing agreement for the sale of a business, as it was not a “real property sales transaction[]”; and (2) there was no possibility of inconsistent rulings so as to justify denying enforcement of the agreement to arbitrate.

We conclude the open listing agreement in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.