MacRovision Corp. v. Dwight Cavendish Developments Ltd.

Good Law
105 F. Supp. 2d 1070·2000 WL 1036181·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10694
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 2000C 99-20011 EAICalifornia3,016 words

Opinion

Opinion

Infante, J.

ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OF U.S. PATENT NUMBER 5,633,927

I. INTRODUCTION

In the present suit, Plaintiff Macrovision Corp. (“Macrovision”) has asserted U.S. Patent No. 5,633,927 (“the ’927 patent”) against Defendant Dwight Cavendish Developments, Inc. (“Dwight Cavendish”). The parties did not agree upon the scope of the patent claims, requiring the court to interpret the disputed claims. See Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967, 979 (Fed.Cir.1995)(en banc), aff'd, 517 U.S. 370 , 116 S.Ct. 1384 , 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996). On December 6,1999, in accordance with Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court appointed Allen M. Lo as a Special Master to assist in this task. The parties submitted claim constructions briefs, and Special Master Lo held a claim construction hearing on February 24, 2000.

Special Master Lo issued his Report on April 17, 2000. On May 1, 2000, Dwight Cavendish filed a Motion to Enter Report of Special' Master, and on May 4, 2000 Macrovision filed a Motion to Modify Report of Special Master. The parties stipulated to a consolidated briefing schedule whereby Dwight Cavendish…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.