Romito

Romito v. Red Plastic Co.

Bad Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 875·38 Cal. App. 4th 59·44 Cal. Rptr. 2d 834·94 Daily Journal DAR 12212·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7168
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 1995B082569California3,689 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ortega, J.

If the technological means exist, must a manufacturer improve its product to guard against injuries resulting from unforeseeable and accidental product misuse in order to stave off potential tort liability? We conclude as a matter of policy that despite the means to build a safer product, a manufacturer owes no duty to prevent injuries resulting from unforeseeable and accidental product misuse. We affirm summary judgment for the defendant manufacturer of a plastic skylight which lacked sufficient impact strength to bear the weight of a falling person.

Background

This appeal involves a wrongful death action. On April 11,1989, decedent Edward Romito, age 63, was employed as a journeyman electrician at the Santa Anita Race Track. Romito, who had 36 years of experience as an electrician, was removing television cables and wires that had been draped over the flat roof of the 4-story Club Court building. The roof was not open to the public and was separated from an abutting terrace by a low wall. The roof contained a row of plastic skylights manufactured by defendant Red Plastic Company, Inc., doing business as Dur-Red Products.

The six-foot-tall and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.