People v. Bradford

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 993·38 Cal. App. 4th 1733·45 Cal. Rptr. 2d 757·95 Daily Journal DAR 13828·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8075
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 12, 1995C019844California1,416 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Defendant Michael Allen Bradford was charged by information with the following offenses:

It was further alleged defendant was armed with a firearm during the commission of the offenses alleged in counts I and II. (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (a)(1).)

Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant pleaded guilty to counts I and IV; the other charges were dismissed.

As pertinent, defendant was sentenced to the upper term of three years on count I plus one-third of a two-year term on count IV. Execution of sentence was stayed and defendant was placed on probation.

The trial court imposed the upper term on count I because defendant possessed two firearms and because the offense showed planning and premeditation.

On appeal, defendant contends the upper term on count I (cultivation of marijuana) was erroneously imposed. He argues his sentence violates the rule of People v. Harvey (1979) 25 Cal.3d 754 [ 159 Cal.Rptr. 696 , 602 P.2d 396 ] because all firearm charges were dismissed pursuant to a plea bargain and his possession of the weapons was not transactionally related to the offense of cultivation of marijuana.

We shall conclude the trial court properly used defendant’s possession…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.