Martin

People v. Martin

Good Law
38 Cal. App. 4th 883·45 Cal. Rptr. 2d 502
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 1995B082876California2,156 words

Opinion

Opinion

Penal Code section 790 is a venue statute. It provides that jurisdiction of a criminal action for murder may be in one of three counties: where the fatal injury was inflicted, where the injured party dies, or where the body was found.

(1a) Here we hold that the constitutional right of vicinage is satisfied if the trial is held in any of the three counties specified in Penal Code section 790.

Defendant James Lindsay Martin appeals a judgment of conviction of murder with findings of the special circumstances of robbery and kidnapping to commit robbery. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 190.2, subd. (a)(17).) He was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. We affirm and conclude Martin received a trial by a jury drawn from the vicinage of his crime.

Mrs. Hendrix, a resident of British Columbia, was traveling in her motorhome through Southern California. While she was in Ventura County, Martin kidnapped, then shot and killed her.

Her body was found in a rural area of Santa Barbara County. There was a bullet hole in her head. A police officer opined at trial that the wound was a "near contact" one. Due to the lack of blood and because there were no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.