In Re Ronald

Good Law
13 Cal. App. 4th 1803·17 Cal. Rptr. 2d 334
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 10, 1993A057906California1,056 words

Opinion

Opinion

POCHE, Acting P.J.

Florence H., the natural mother of Ronald V., appeals from an order denying her request for a modification because of changed circumstances (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 388) [1] of an order terminating her parental rights which issued at the conclusion of a permanency planning hearing (§ 366.26).

The issue before us is a very simple one. May a parent whose rights have been terminated subsequently seek to attack that order by filing a motion in the juvenile court under section 388 to modify the order based upon changed circumstances? We conclude that the juvenile court is without jurisdiction to hear such a motion.

The factual circumstances of this case are briefly these. Ronald V. who was born September 22, 1983, was apparently the victim of sexual abuse committed by a boyfriend of his mother. By a petition filed in December 1988 the county sought to make him a dependent of the court. Reunification services with the parents were terminated at the 12-month review hearing.

In February 1990 Ronald was placed in the foster home of Richard Smith, a man in his early 60's who was a former boyfriend of Florence H., and who had continued to express an interest in,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.