Mercer

Mercer v. Borden

Good Law
11 F. Supp. 2d 1190·98 Daily Journal DAR 10084·1998 WL 433870·6 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1723·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11594
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 1998SA CV 98-266-GLT [AM]California592 words

Opinion

Opinion

Taylor, J.

ORDER

On first Ninth Circuit impression, the Court holds the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 and following, extends potential liability to individuals.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff alleges various wrongful employment practices against his employer and several manager-level individuals, including refusal to allow Plaintiff to take leave to care for his wife during a dangerous pregnancy. Among other claims, Plaintiff asserts a violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 and following.

The individual manager-level defendants move to dismiss the FMLA claim, contending individual defendants cannot be liable under that statute.

II. DISCUSSION

Whether potential liability under the FMLA extends to individuals is an issue of first impression in the Ninth Circuit. Additionally, no other Circuit Court has yet decided this issue, and the few district courts that have addressed it reached different conclusions. However, there is a clear weight of authority.

Most of the district courts that have considered the question have concluded potential liability under the FMLA extends to individuals. The definition of “employer” in the FMLA is identical to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.