Ramirez

Ramirez v. MacAdam

Good Law
13 Cal. App. 4th 1638·16 Cal. Rptr. 2d 911·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 215·93 Daily Journal DAR 2921·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1637
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 1993B059896California1,177 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

This action for personal injuries arose out of an automobile accident. Grace Ramirez (plaintiff) was a passenger in a car driven by her sister, defendant Gloria Pastran, when it was struck by an automobile driven by defendant Cathryn MacAdam. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in her favor after a jury verdict in the amount of $3,000. Plaintiff raises numerous contentions on appeal relating to the testimony of various physicians, time restrictions imposed by the trial court, jury instructions, cost awards, and the new trial motion. In the published portion of this opinion we address the questions of whether the trial court erroneously declined to permit videotaping of a court-ordered medical examination conducted pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2032. Solely pursuant to a concession, we reverse in part the order denying plaintiff’s motion to tax costs. The judgment is in all other respects affirmed.

II.-III. D.

2. The videotape issue

Plaintiff’s principal contention with respect to the court-ordered medical examination of her is that it was prejudicial error to deny her request to videotape the physical examination. To date, no California appellate court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.