Cole

Royal Insurance v. Cole

Good Law
13 Cal. App. 4th 880·16 Cal. Rptr. 2d 660·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 157·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1237
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 1993F016134California3,591 words

Opinion

Opinion

Harris, J.

Introduction

Appellant Aaron Cole was a passenger in an automobile driven by Troy Franks, son of Charles and Barbara Franks, Royal Insurance Company’s (Royal) insured. Royal interpled the $100,000 limits of the Franks liability policy because of the extent of injuries suffered by Cole and others. Cole filed a cross-complaint for declaratory relief against Royal seeking damages under the underinsurance provisions of the Franks policy. After a trial on Cole’s cross-complaint, the trial court entered judgment for Royal.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Troy Franks was involved in a two-vehicle collision when the automobile he was operating rear-ended a tractor-trailer owned by Stanley Houser and operated by Neil McDonald. Cole and Mitchell Madron were passengers in the Franks vehicle. Royal’s liability policy for the Franks vehicle was a single limit $100,000 policy.

As a result of injuries suffered, Cole filed a complaint against Franks, McDonald and Houser; Houser filed a complaint against Franks and McDonald; and Madron filed a complaint against Troy and Charles Franks, McDonald and Houser.

Based on the claims against Franks, on August 14, 1987, Royal filed its complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.