Hoffman

Hoffman v. Connell

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 716·73 Cal. App. 4th 1194·87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 272·99 Daily Journal DAR 7913
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 2, 1999A085214California3,571 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jones, J.

The executors of the estate of Constance T. Cummings contend the trial court erred when it ruled they were obligated to pay California estate tax on property which Ms. Cummings did not own. We agree and will reverse the judgment entered by the trial court.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Constance T. Cummings (Connie) was married to Robert S. Cummings (Robert) who was a resident of St. Thomas, the United States Virgin Islands. It was a second marriage for both of them. Robert had a son named Donald from a prior marriage.

Robert died on November 3, 1988. His will established the Robert S. Cummings Trust. The trust corpus was $2 million in securities, held by an investment firm located in New York, that Robert owned as his separate property. The will directed the. trustees to invest the corpus and to pay the net income to Connie at least annually. The trustees were given the discretion to pay principal to Connie if they deemed it advisable, but no such payments were ever made. Connie did not have the power to change the terms of the trust, to remove the trustees, or to appoint or withdraw principal during her lifetime or upon her death. According to the terms of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.